Showing posts with label corporate greed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporate greed. Show all posts
Friday, February 19, 2010
Friday, February 12, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
how long til JetBlue and Southwest succumb?
Big Airlines raising checked bag fees. pretty soon, we'll just buy clothes at our destinations. or not fly entirely.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Never Break Chin
we know where NBC's loyalties lie. this is a complete snafu of epic proportions. Team Conan all the way!
Labels:
Conan O'Brien,
corporate greed,
Jay Leno,
NBC,
stupidity
Friday, January 8, 2010
kill your television
and the first post of the new year is about ... TV.
having finally taken the plunge on cable (and HD) around the end of summer last year, i figured the costs would still be affordable. my bro-in-law handed down his first HDTV to us, allowing me to hold off buying one for some time. plus, i was finally able to reap the benefits of my longtime PS3, in terms of gaming, media streaming and finally being able to watch Blu-Ray discs for real. and as a Time Warner customer for 5 years (Road Runner only, plus some public cable channels), didn't make sense to go somewhere else - i locked myself in for two years at a lower rate, then took their basic HDTV lineup. i really didn't need HBO or any other movie channels. just give me my basic channels, ESPN, NatGeo, Discovery, Travel, History, and for my wife: Food Network, HGTV, TLC, and all in HD - am good. the other channels are part and parcel of the lineup and nothing can be done about this, for now.
too bad they don't have real a la carte, where you can just pay only for the channels you really want, not package deals. no one in the cable industry and TV networks has the balls to do this. because all that matters is the bottom line. they've become fat and lazy, because with the customer having the power to choose which channel to really watch, they'll be forced to produce really quality shows that would be worthy of the customer's dollars. and i guess that's too much work for them.
and the entry of online streaming, as an alternative to traditional TV, should only serve to make them wise up, instead of trying to maintain the status quo and gouge existing customers for more. with the Comcast deal with NBC Universal, and Fox holding Time Warner hostage for more fees, you have to wonder how much the impact is for the average subscriber, especially in terms of money coming out of their wallets. Hulu may be the business model for the coming times, but free content can only last or may be sufficient for so long. either way, you have to pay, regardless of the method you want to get your entertainment. eventually, you'll be watching your shows online on your current HDTVs or wireless TVs hooked to the router. the traditional hardwired cable connections won't go away, but that's dependent whether our home internet can eventually handle the bandwidth required for full cable programming.
the game changers has been High Def and content. i doubt if anybody wants to go back to their old TVs after getting a taste of HD (especially for movies and sports. reality TV and porn? ehhhh.). i know i can't. am not sure if 3DTV is up my alley yet, but that's where things are headed as well. oh crap, does that mean Blu-Ray will be obsolete in two years?
i only hope at this point that the new TW/Fox deal doesn't mean they're going to change my locked-in rate. there's gonna be war if that happens. maybe at some point i'll need to wean myself off the dependence on cable - or maybe not.
having finally taken the plunge on cable (and HD) around the end of summer last year, i figured the costs would still be affordable. my bro-in-law handed down his first HDTV to us, allowing me to hold off buying one for some time. plus, i was finally able to reap the benefits of my longtime PS3, in terms of gaming, media streaming and finally being able to watch Blu-Ray discs for real. and as a Time Warner customer for 5 years (Road Runner only, plus some public cable channels), didn't make sense to go somewhere else - i locked myself in for two years at a lower rate, then took their basic HDTV lineup. i really didn't need HBO or any other movie channels. just give me my basic channels, ESPN, NatGeo, Discovery, Travel, History, and for my wife: Food Network, HGTV, TLC, and all in HD - am good. the other channels are part and parcel of the lineup and nothing can be done about this, for now.
too bad they don't have real a la carte, where you can just pay only for the channels you really want, not package deals. no one in the cable industry and TV networks has the balls to do this. because all that matters is the bottom line. they've become fat and lazy, because with the customer having the power to choose which channel to really watch, they'll be forced to produce really quality shows that would be worthy of the customer's dollars. and i guess that's too much work for them.
and the entry of online streaming, as an alternative to traditional TV, should only serve to make them wise up, instead of trying to maintain the status quo and gouge existing customers for more. with the Comcast deal with NBC Universal, and Fox holding Time Warner hostage for more fees, you have to wonder how much the impact is for the average subscriber, especially in terms of money coming out of their wallets. Hulu may be the business model for the coming times, but free content can only last or may be sufficient for so long. either way, you have to pay, regardless of the method you want to get your entertainment. eventually, you'll be watching your shows online on your current HDTVs or wireless TVs hooked to the router. the traditional hardwired cable connections won't go away, but that's dependent whether our home internet can eventually handle the bandwidth required for full cable programming.
the game changers has been High Def and content. i doubt if anybody wants to go back to their old TVs after getting a taste of HD (especially for movies and sports. reality TV and porn? ehhhh.). i know i can't. am not sure if 3DTV is up my alley yet, but that's where things are headed as well. oh crap, does that mean Blu-Ray will be obsolete in two years?
i only hope at this point that the new TW/Fox deal doesn't mean they're going to change my locked-in rate. there's gonna be war if that happens. maybe at some point i'll need to wean myself off the dependence on cable - or maybe not.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Monday, May 11, 2009
and now a message for the MTA
F** You! you hold us hostage twice - first by crappy service, then the threat of fare hikes. you're gonna raise them anyway, regardless of what we do. what's that? you can't hear me? that's how your P.A. systems work in your stations and your trains, M****ers!!! yes, i'm like Rahm Emanuel!!
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Monday, April 20, 2009
and they'll sell us the cable they'll hang us with
Cable companies want to gouge us a lot more, says this NYT article:
the restaurant bill analogy does not apply for cable. you set up all-in-one plans to lure customers, then you complain of the usage. tell you what - open up a la carte service for cable TV channels and maybe we can discuss this usage pricing thing for the Internet.
The cost of providing Internet service is about to fall even more, as cable companies install new technology, called Docsis 3, that will both increase their capacity and allow them to offer much faster download speeds.
So far, however, companies in the United States have chosen to use Docsis 3 as an opportunity to offer far more expensive Internet plans. Comcast has introduced a new 50-megabit-per-second service at $139 a month, compared with its existing service that costs about $45 a month for 8 megabits per second. Time Warner just announced it will charge $99 for 50 megabits per second.
By contrast, JCom, the largest cable company in Japan, sells service as fast as 160 megabits per second for $60 a month, only $5 a month more than its slower service.
Why so cheap? JCom faces more competition from other Internet providers than companies in the United States do.
the restaurant bill analogy does not apply for cable. you set up all-in-one plans to lure customers, then you complain of the usage. tell you what - open up a la carte service for cable TV channels and maybe we can discuss this usage pricing thing for the Internet.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)